首页> 外文OA文献 >Older people’s forums in the United Kingdom:Civic engagement and activism reviewed
【2h】

Older people’s forums in the United Kingdom:Civic engagement and activism reviewed

机译:英国老年人论坛:公民参与和行动主义回顾

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

PurposeThis paper reviews the literature on UK older people’s forums. Forums seek to influence statutory responses to ageing, and enable older people to speak up on matters important to them. The review examined three facets of forums: their membership, structures and effectiveness.MethodsMethods included searching databases, internet and specialist libraries for materials relating to older people’s forums. Key points were extracted and source material described but not subject to quality appraisal. Relevant non-UK studies are included to draw contrast and comparisons. Findings Several studies and reports have explored forum members’ socio-demographic profiles, motivations and triggers for joining and the two-way rewards of participation. However, membership remains a minority activity, with only a small percentage of members actively engaged and the review highlights gaps in the literature on widening participation. Both statutory and voluntary sectors have supported forum development and sustainability. There is little data on formal structures but some exploration of the informal communications and behaviours that sustain them has been undertaken. Forums are viewed as effective but resource intensive. The size and representativeness of the membership, strength of influence and deployment of members’ expertise are all identified as potential contributors to effectiveness.Research limitationsSome material may not have been accessible and there is potential bias by greater inclusion of journal published materials than other possible sources. Material was not quality appraised, and research literature and self-reporting by forums are presented alongside each other.Practical ImplicationsPractitioners should familiarise themselves with current older people’s organisations locally to ensure that consultations are broad and reach different groups. While partnerships with voluntary sector health and care providers are encouraged some of these groups may not wish to represent all older people. Wider reach may provide multiple perspectives. Help in kind as well as financial resources may be welcomed by older people’s groups, such as meeting spaces, assistance with administration, and briefings that are accessible. Offering to meet with older people’s forums to discuss matters regularly may provide insight into experiences of services and changing needs earlier than professional feedback. Dismissing older people’s forums as made up of the ‘usual suspects’ is likely to be unfair and unhelpful to building up positive relationships.ValueThe review provides a preliminary assessment of the size and scope of research and grey literature on UK older people’s forums, synthesising points of similarity and difference and identifying clear gaps in the evidence.
机译:目的本文回顾了英国老年人论坛上的文献。论坛旨在影响对老龄化的法定回应,并使老年人能够就对他们重要的事情发表意见。审查审查了论坛的三个方面:其成员,结构和有效性。方法方法包括在数据库,互联网和专业图书馆中搜索与老年人论坛有关的材料。提取了关键点并描述了原始资料,但未进行质量评估。相关的非英国研究也包括在内以进行对比和比较。结果一些研究和报告探讨了论坛成员的社会人口统计学概况,加入的动机和诱因以及参与的双向奖励。但是,成员资格仍然是少数活动,只有一小部分成员积极参与,该评论突出了有关扩大参与范围的文献中的空白。法定和自愿部门都支持论坛的发展和可持续性。关于正式结构的数据很少,但是已经进行了一些非正式交流和维持非正式交流的行为的探索。论坛被认为是有效的但资源密集的。成员的规模和代表性,影响力和成员专业知识的运用都被认为是影响有效性的潜在因素。研究局限性某些资料可能无法获得,而且与其他可能的来源相比,更多地包含期刊出版的资料可能会产生偏差。材料没有经过质量评估,研究文献和论坛的自我报告也相互介绍。实际意义从业者应熟悉当地当地的老年人组织,以确保进行广泛的咨询并覆盖不同的人群。虽然鼓励与志愿部门的保健和护理提供者建立伙伴关系,但其中一些群体可能并不希望代表所有老年人。范围更广可以提供多种视角。老年人团体可能会欢迎实物帮助以及财务资源,例如会议场所,行政管理协助和可访问的简报。提供与老年人论坛定期开会的提议,可以比专业反馈更早地洞悉服务体验和不断变化的需求。驳回由``通常的嫌疑犯''组成的老年人论坛可能不公平且无助于建立积极的关系价值评估提供了对英国老年人论坛研究规模和范围以及灰色文献的初步评估,综合观点相似和不同之处,并找出证据中的明显空白。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号